Saturday, April 16, 2011
World Economic Forecast in 21st century and after
The map above explains the volume of the future economic growth in different regions in the world. The predicted volume of economic growth shown in this map is measured by the variables shown in as follows:
A1. The overall market potential indices (Click the link to read what this word means).
A2. Geographic advantages such as the short great circle distance from economically active regions, capability to have a good dock, being neither landlocked nor island nation (not significantly affecting developed nations and Asian emerging nations, but significantly affecting majority of least developed economies).
A3. The growth in productive population growth relative to the unproductive population growth (reasonable birth control, affordability of general education and parental love for children, and adjusted population growth to economic growth and land-capability).
A4. The human capital development (E.g. Education, Individual Liberty and Right, and Rationality). This affects the speed of learning newly introduced technologies in the world, adapting them to produce and sell newly introduced goods and services created, and ability to invent an original new technology themselves by referring to existing technologies.
A5. The natural resource reserves, which create a trade surplus. The impact of benefit from it is bigger in emerging economies and least developed economies than developed economies, but some developed economies are able to develop further more than the other developed economies due to the extra surplus by extracting natural resources.
A6. The political and social stability in both the present and the future time period.
On the top of these variables applying to scaling the predicted economic growth of all kinds of economies, there are the other variables which only scale a particular kind of economies. There are two main different characteristics of economic regions introduced in this essay, the Northern economies and the Southern economies.
The Northern economies, shown in Blue, are those whose economic growth is mainly stimulated by the variables shown in as follows:
N1. European rationalism and strong egalitarianism (except for Russia) which influence the level of intelligence per head,
N2. Newly introduced trade integration such as the Eurozone economy which benefits to the Eastern European nations,
N3. Philosophy influenced by ancient Greco-Roman philosophies and Christianity which are ones of the remarkable variables implanting the spirit of capitalism, such as contract, fairness, honesty, ideality, individuality, trust, and unity, into ordinary individual citizens' mind,
N4. Various scientific innovations. Majority of them are innovated in the Western civilisations including the former USSR block excluding Islamic areas. The currently most notably advancing Western civilisations are Germanic and Scandinavian nations.
N5. Not suffering from negative assets of the past imperial period. Not only Spain, Portugal, England (So, exclude the other regions in the United Kingdom), and France, but also Japan (Not only before and during the world war 2 but also the post war period economic imperialism) and the United States of America (USA). These three following things are the negative side effects of their past imperialism haunting on them:
n5.1 The economic sunk costs caused by a rapid decline in their holding power,
n5.2 Inattentive and negligence due to their arrogance of the old glory,
n5.3 Mobocracy of the mobs spoiled by a habit of extracting their wealth from the wealth accumulated in the past (The over expansion of economy causes a severe downturn in the future. The bigger nations are less likely to avoid this situation than the smaller nations)
* The Soviet communist regime can also be seen as another form of imperialism. But, this imperialism had never brought any significant prosperity enough to leave these three pathologies. In another word, the communist imperialism has failed to be a prosperous imperialism so that it was an unsuccessful imperialism.
The Southern economies, shown in Red, are those whose economic growth is encouraged by the variables shown in as follows:
S1. The strong politically and socially cohesive policy, which is remarkable to support a strong but sustainable economic growth by uniting all different cultural identities and economic and social backgrounds of citizens by selecting one charismatic political authority as the opinion leader. A strong but sustainable economic growth resulted by this policy has been seen in the Eastern world for a long time and is recently introduced in many South American and some African nations.
s1.1 Some nations use the development dictatorship based on rational-secularism which is most notably seen traditionally in Asia, and recently in Latin America and some African nations;
s1.2 The other nations use the common religious value as a symbol of unification such as theocracy in almost all Middle-Eastern nations and majority of African nations.
S2. Stable urbanisation process. This variable is related to the variable A3 (The growth in productive population growth) the variable A4 (The human capital development), and the variable A6 (The political and social stability). Nowadays, thanks to the globalisation encouraged by the rapid information technological growth, people in emerging and least developed economies have become able to copy the newly introduced knowledge and technologies, and use them to produce better goods and services. But, in order to grow their economy by this process, they need to fulfil these three following conditions:
s2.1 They need to improve and develop their education system to become able to copy the newly introduced technologies.
s2.2 They need a huge population in either their homeland or neighbourhood countries, or both, to sell these goods and services faster to grow their business.
s2.3 In order to accomplish these two objectives, the political and social stability is significantly required.
All in all, these nations require an urbanisation of their economy, which means increasing population density, which enables people to exchange information and physical resources each other fast. The urbanisation requires a huge population already existing. Therefore, an already highly populated nations tend to have an advantage.
Furthermore, the urbanisation lowers the cost of developing human capital because the speed of exchanging knowlegde and technology becomes faster as the place become urbanised. The cost of developing human capital used to be a big obstacle for least developing nations when there was a huge barrier of exchaning the information. The Cold War used to block flexible information flows in the globe, and the ongoing political unrest disrupted people in these nations united. Nonetheless, both The end of the Cold War and the rapid information technological growth since then brought a globally free exchange of information flow. In addition, the knowledge and the wisdom gained from this flexible information flow have enabled people there to become harmonised with themselves. This aspect of the globalisation has made the harmonisation and the urbanisation tremendously easier than the past
Unlike the North economies where people have been already unified under the strong common identity and the stable political and social environment, the Southern economies tend to lack of the unification seen in the Western economies. In order to concentrate people together into one area, the political stability and the community harmonisation are highly required. In particular, in these Southern economies, the conflict between different identities tends to be an obstacle of their urbanisation process. Therefore, the variable A6 (The political and social stability) is a key element to achieve their urbanisation.
S3. The power to monopolise the geographic advantages. This variable is related to the variable A2 (Geographic advantages) and the variable A3 (The growth in productive population growth). The typical example is Singapore before Malaysia built a large scale industrial port. At this time, Singapore was only the country in the strait of Malacca so that Singapore could monopolise the revenue coming from the logistic industries, the processing industries, the financial industries (at this time, it needed to rely on geographic advantage far more than nowadays) and the tourist industries. However, since Malaysia built a new large scale industrial port in the own land, the market in the strait of Malacca has become oligopoly so that Singapore has become no longer able to exploit the monopolistic power there.
In already developed nations (In 20th century) such as Western Europe (some Central and Eastern European nations became developed in 21st century though), North America, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan did not hugely have to rely on the geographic advantage because these developed nations already had a self-sufficient domestic economy. By contrast, nations of both emerging economy and least developed economy need to rely on the revenue come from the international trade before they are fully developed enough to have a reasonably self-sufficient domestic economy.
The overal summery of these economic predictions is that all economies depends on the Market Potential (i.e. Geographic advantages, the high demand volume of exports from these economies, and the high human capital development ration) without a doubt. The Northern economies is strongly affected by whether or not past imperial experience haunts, and has better potential if they are located North much as possible (More North tends to be more human capital). The Southern economic growth is significantly correlated with their population more than any variable, and the some geographic advantages such as having a good location to build a good large scale industrial port and having natural resource reserves.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Science and Logics are subjective: Mathematics is only the objective science!

Einstein and the modern physicists amended this formula into
E=MC^2
, which is the main stream theorem.
The old Newtonian model, E=MC, had never tested to assess whether it fit in with how actually the geometry worked in the real world. This formula was based on a pure assumption.
However, all natural science models, except those based on statistic modelling method, are problematic and highly subjective as same as logic.
The mathematical model is useful and costless, however all the signs and the sensitivities in the formulae are just assumed rather than produced especially in the old days when the computer technology and the statistic theories were not developed enough.
The reason why natural science is subjective as same as logic is as follows.
As a matter of fact, the results determine the theories rather than the theories determine the result in natural science. All scientists create their theories by finding the result to model them. However, many scientists always think that their theories contribute to find the results, and their thought is a completely false belief and merely a propaganda to make mass believe they are the authority.
Einsteinian and modern scientists' amendment of Newtonian science is the typical example. As these modern scientists examined how the geometry worked in the real world, they finally found out that the energy was not linear as what Newtonian scientists assumed; and then they changed the formulae.
Furthermore, these scientists claim their theories produce the mathematical models. Nonetheless, this is also the false assumption. They create mathematical formulae which "look like" as though they fit in with what the variables move. But, these formulae hardly become perfectly fitting with what the variables move in the real world because there is always an error (a residual in their formulae). The formulae may be valid if the error correction model proves the error tends to be corrected.
Nevertheless, this does not encourage to believe the theories produce the mathematical models: It is more likely that the mathematical models find the most appropriate theories. For example, in electro-magnetics, a physicist tried to make a mathematical modelling which models the movement of electro-magnetic by using various variables this physicist thought needed. However, the model did not fit in with what the movement is actually is. There is only another variable in the formula was needed, but this physicist did not know what this unknow variable was then. The task for this physicist then became to find this additional unknown variable. Then, this physicist finally found it, and tried the scientific experiment by referring to the new formula!
As Immanuel Kant, the famous German philosopher, said mathematics could be the only science which is objective.
Only the sets of "a priori", the objective measure verifying the knowledge emphasised is absolute, in the physical world (which is what I also called "the real world" in this article) are latitude, longitude, altitude, time, and immediate feelings. The other physical knowledge, in past, present, and future, only comes from the bias induced by subjective feelings and "expected" outcomes.
Logic does not have an objective measure to self-contradict to proof this makes sense unlike Mathematics which has a strong objective measure called "Axiom".
Scientific knowledge based on assumption offered by scientific logic is therefore not objective and highly subjective because it is awfully biased by the subjective assumptions.
If formulae and their variables, signs, and sensitivities are found by statistically analysing the data sets found in a survey or experiments in our real world, these formulae are at least verifying to be based on a priori of the physical world, latitude, longitude, altitude, time, and immediate feelings, and the mathematical world, axiom. Therefore, they are more likely to be objective.
Statistical models are useful to make semi-objective formulae because they can be proved and self-contradicted by "a priori" unlike the formulae and their variable, signs, and sensitivities are based on assumption based on pure logic.
* The following quote is based on what John Locke, the British philosopher called the father or liberalism, Immanuel Kant, one of the most influential modern German philosopher, and one of my mathematics teachers in one of the universities I graduated from stated:
... I believe in God; God is a fundamental axiom of our world; mathematics is based on axiom; both axioms, God and mathematical axiom, are "a priori", the objective measure verifying the knowledge emphasised is absolute; Mathematics assesses axiom; God and mathematical axiom are absolute; Mathematics has a power to assess something equivalent to God, the absolute being; The existence of God could be inferred by mathematics as John Locke stated in "An essay concerning human understanding"; As my Mathe teacher said God may admire Mathematics then; As my Mathe teacher said, Mathematics is equivalent to or more powerful than God; Therefore, I admire and believe in Mathematics, based on axiom, and Statistics, based on both mathematics and "a priori" of the physical world which may be called as God, as the only objective science!
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Reading list of articles on line
------ Econometric Data -----
* World Data:
- Penn World Table
http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt_index.php
The new page (Groningen Growth and Development Centre, Faculty of Economics and Business):
https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/
- IMF Data Mapper
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDP_RPCH@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
- Penn Center for International Development at Harvard University (CID)
http://www.cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/ciddata.html
- eurostat, Data Base
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
- Gleditsch and Ward, ‘Minimum Distance Data // Kristian Skrede Gleditsch ‘(2001)
http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ksg/mindist.html
- Penn Actualités du CEPII, Geodesic Distances’
http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm
- CIA - The World Factbook -- Field Listing :: Area
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2147.html
- MarineWaypoints.com - Great Circle Distance Calculator
http://www.marinewaypoints.com/learn/greatcircle.shtml
- Paul Hensel's General International Data Page
http://www.paulhensel.org/dataintl.html
- Happy Planet Index
http://www.happyplanetindex.org/data/
- OECD Statistics
http://www.oecd.org/statistics/
* UK and Scottish Data:
- Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics
http://www.sns.gov.uk/
- nomis - official labour market statistics
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/
- General Register Office for Scotland (GROS)
http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/
------ Philosophy and Law ------
* Project Gutenberg (Public Domains):
http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page
* Max Stirner
- Egoism:
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/34580
- Max Stirner (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy):
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/max-stirner/
* Jeremy Bentham
- An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation
http://www.utilitarianism.com/jeremy-bentham/index.html
- A Fragment on Government
http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/bentham/government.htm
- Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)
http://www.victorianweb.org/philosophy/bentham.html
* Jean Jacques Rousseau
- THE SOCIAL CONTRACT
OR PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL RIGHT
http://www.constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm
* Matthew Arnold
- Culture and Anarchy
http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/4212/pg4212.html
* Charles de Montesquieu
- The Spirit of Laws
http://www.constitution.org/cm/sol-02.htm
-- The Spirit of Laws
http://www.constitution.org/cm/sol_01.htm
* J. S. Mill
- A System of Logic
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=daQAAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+System+of+Logic&source=bl&ots=_ObnctNc3D&sig=1YQntmmSeX6wmta0QRzQiOwa3NI&hl=en&ei=IDYjTZ35HMq2hQfwxpW4Dg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false
* Erik Olin Wright
- http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/
* Adolf Hitler
- Mein Kampf:
http://magister.msk.ru/library/politica/hitla002.htm
* Egoism
- Rational Egoism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egoism/#3
- Rational The Ego and His Own: Introduction
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNiyxnxId_4&feature=related
- Stirner on Egoism vs. Immorality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF4pyh5KESs
* Law
- A Primer on the Civil-Law System
http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/CivilLaw.pdf/$file/CivilLaw.pdf
- Wikipedia, Comparative law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_law
- Wikipedia, Civil law (legal system)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_%28legal_system%29
- Wikipedia, Equity (law)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equity_%28law%29
- Wikipedia, Custom (law)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customary_law
* Russian New Year Tradition Movie:
- The Irony Of Fate
http://video.kylekeeton.com/2008/12/russian-video-new-year-tradition-movie.html
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
The oil price inflation is over exaggerated!
all the investors are just over-anticipating the bad news in the future.
That is why the oil price is rising, but this price rise will be just temporary.
Therefore, we should not be confused between the fake shock and the real shock.
According to the commentator on this video clip, the current oil price shock is the fake shock.
I would recommend not to react against the current shock on the oil price.
The oil price will goes down after a while.
My concern is that the reactions toward this shock (e.g. the interest rate hike due to the expected inflation caused by this oil price shock) themselves will induce another economic recession.
The controlling inflation is a top priority of any monetary policy so that the reaction toward the current fear of the oil price inflation itself (raising the interest rate) is right.
However, the monetary policy has to re-set the interest rate down soon as the "temporary" price shock calms down in order to avoid the recession caused by the excessly high interest rate undermining a healthy economic recovery.
Hense, I recommend you neither to intend to purchase the oil in the forward rate agreement nor to buy the share related to the oil industry in the forward rate agreement.
Otherwise, you are predicted to make a loss in the trade.
Tuesday, February 01, 2011
Concerning Fiscal Conservativism and Keynesian, and European Integration
I'd introduce a massive, wholesae Keynesian policy, of state spending to invest in infrastructural development and to uphold demand across manufacturing and industry. Then, utilise the subsequent growth to pay down the subsequent high debt levels.
Coalition is monetarist and fiscall conservative, thus I disagree. Labour aren't real Keynesians, they just want to spend money haphazardly all over the place - thus they are even more dangerously irresponsible than the coalition. Labours non-economics would merely result in protecting vested interests.
(My comment)
Although I quote a lot of Keynesian analysis, I am monetary and fiscal conservative. There is an example: One of the reason why I say is that I often refer to the "liquidity trap" mentioned by Keynesian analysis to reject the "hypowered money" mentioned by the one type of monetarists.
By the way, your theory faces on the contradiction:
(1) You support liberal economism,
(2) you support Keynesian policy,
(3) you support the European Monetary and Fiscal integration,
(4) you support the Federalism in the European Union level
(5) then you support Human right in the European Unionism
Then, (4)+(3)+(2) contradicts (1),
although (2) or (2) + (3) itself does not necessarily contradicts (1) if it is in a smaller scale.
If I were supporting your policy, I would add
(6) Abolition or minimisation of trade unions in the EU (at least to the US level), and setting minimum wage at the level of the most deprived EU member country.
and
(7) strong Fascist social policy intervention to enforce to replace the national governments with the branch local authorities of the European Federal government and to eliminate the enermies and the social defectors who disrupt the smooth European integration under the federal rule.
But if you add all up from (1) to (7), you MUST subtract (5) to accomplish all the rests.
If German 3rd empire had conquelled the whole Europe, the true and stable united Europe would have been established.
The current speed of the both economic and social European integration is too slow and too unstable!
At least, Britain should keep away from the wave of this danger...
Friday, January 07, 2011
Currently, both the EU and the USA are against the free market principle
Nonetheless, the common currency does not imply the free market. The beneficiality of introducing a common currency in the EU is that the trade frequency between countries in the EU is significantly higher than the USA. However, the labour mobility rate between countries in the EU is significantly lower than the US counterpart.
It is not fully proven yet whether a common currency leads the economy to have a high trade frequency and the labour mobility across the border or these factors require introducing a common currency.
If the statement "Free market demands common currency" is valid, it should be that both the trade frequency and the labour mobility have been high before a common currency is introduced, and then a common currency should be introduced afterward. However, if the reason to introduce the common currency is to "expect" the trade frequency and the labour mobility to become high after introducing the currency, the aspect does not fulfill the natural mechanism of the free market. Under the free market, needs induce the supply; expectations are not necessarily relevant to induce the supply.
Under the current European situation, although the aggregate level of trade frequency across the border is high there are a few countries which do not fulfill the condition such as Ireland and Greece. Furthermore, there is a huge barrier of introducing a common currency under the free market principle which is the labour mobility. If the EU situation is that the free market demands the Euro, the labour mobilty should have been much higher than what the EU has got.
All in all, I would like to strongly put emphasis on the statement that both the EU and the USA do not hold their own single currency used among their own states or countries inside them due to the free-marketism.
For example, as a matter of fact, the USA should abandon the single currency system and her federal government interaction into her market if she wants a free market! The US market has a significantly lower trade frequency across the borders between her countries than the EU and Asian economic regions. The current US situation craves for the strong federal planned economic intervention in order to stick these individual states with being the United States of America!!
In order to accomplish to estabilish a free market system, abolition of nation states is necessary in order to allow all individual regions to become free from any planned economic intevention. Overall, nationalism and unionism never go well together with a free market! "Anarch-Capitalism" is only the answer to support free market!!
