Being against Darwinian evolution theory does not always imply supporting the creation theory. My view, influenced by the ecological niche theory, certainly admitted that all creatures are biologically related to each other, and humans were the modified from apes. It suggests to be sceptical about calling this modification process as "evolution", and disagrees with the theory explaining the difference of our characteristics is mainly determined by gene.
The fundamental problem of Darwinian evolution theory is that it largely ignores the societal impacts on forming creatures' characteristics. The hypothesis of my supporting theory is that the ancestors of human-beings were "accidentally" modified from apes rather than naturally evolved. Unlike the evolution theory regards, my supporting alternative perspective hypothesises that our ancestors were discriminated from apes because they were seen as defected rather than evolved.
Darwinian evolution theory regards human-beings were gradually evolved from apes so that the DNA component is only slightly different between humans and apes. By contrast, my supporting alternative theory emphasises that the DNA is not quite important to make the big difference of creatures. The important factor of distinguishing the characteristics and the quality of creatures is "niche", the separation. My hypothesis is that, even though there are two creatures whose DNA component is completely same with each other, these creatures turn up to be the completely different kinds of creature from each other when they are brought up with in the completely different living environment.
Furthermore, the modification, defined to be the evolution by Darwinism, takes place in order to win in the survival competition, and majority of this gene group welcomes this modification process. Nevertheless, this perspective offered by the evolution theory encounters with two following contradictions.
Firstly, the evolution theory fails to explain that many historically remarkable figures called "genius" suffer from some biological defect. These individuals are endowed with special ability and talent which is superior to what the other majority have. Some researchers who specialise in both biology ans psychology discovered that a part of the brain function becomes stronger than the other parts when a brain is defective. Then, these researchers explained that majority of the genius persons such as Da Vinci, Edison, and Einstein are severe handicapped. These figures became remarkable because they could use their very unique strong ability to compensate their defecting abilities which ordinary human-beings have got.
Secondly, the world social structure cannot be explained by the evolution theory. By means of Mendelian inheritance theory, the White Caucasians are composed of the inferior DNA. But, these White Caucasians are the dominant ethnicity in this world now. Some researchers claim that Mongolians were born as the outcome of Down syndrome (Remember that this used to be called Mongolian syndrome). But, these Mongolians recorded the highest average IQ among all ethnic groups. Therefore, the DNA theory and the evolution theories are mislead to explain about our world socio-biological structure...!
Thomas Malthus, one of British Classical Economists, argued that the evolution makes some characteristics better off by worsening other good characteristics off. If humans were evolved from apes, we can recognise that the physical strength of apes is certainly superior to humans'. When we compare different human races, each human race has got its own unique strength and weakness so that we are neither superior nor inferior to the others; we are just different.
When one individual human survives and become superior to the others in the competition among all humans, Darwinian evolution theorists tend to call this individual human as the superior one or the evolved one. But, owing to the two problems in the evolution mentioned previously, this does not seem to be a right expression to explain about how the unique remarkable human-beings, such as those called the genius, and the different types of human-being are born. The superior/evolved humans explained by the evolution theory are not those who are modified from all the other human-beings. Those who survive and win in the competition of the already existing living environment without being discriminated/isolated/distinguished from the others are not modified from the others; They become superior to the others because they are not different from all the others. If they are significantly different from all the others, then they will be rather discriminated/isolated/distinguished from this human community.
Generally speaking, all creatures are feared of the difference especially when they live in the community where individualism is hardly tolerated. Almost all remarkable figures called genius are from the Western civilisation where the individual difference is highly tolerated. But, these "genius" experienced a very tough life. These genius were not the winner of the "competition"; they could take advantage of their strength because they lived, thought, and acted differently from the others. Furthermore, even in the Western civilisation, it has become very tough for many potential genius to become famous because this world requires humans to become more homogeneous than the past, and also requires humans to compete among all the others with this condition.
The biological modification takes place when they are excluded (discriminated/isolated/distinguished) from all the others. Humans are the modified creatures from apes; humans were "not evolved" from apes. The modified individual (Whom Darwinian evolution theorists call "The evolved ones") will not be those who are thriving well in harmony with all the others: What Darwinian evolution theorists call the evolved ones shall be those who are discriminated, isolated, and/or seen as an eccentric!
