Showing posts with label Futurism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Futurism. Show all posts

Thursday, November 07, 2024

Manifesto Fictosexualism!

 

I would like to declare for the manifesto insisting on the rise and the full right of Fictosexualism! 

This is one of the glorious cause of supporting Progressive Libertarianism /  Classical Liberalism!

I follow the ethics of my admirable philosopher Jeremy Bentham saying "The greatest sum of pleasures with the lowest sum of pains is the principle of moral and legislation." Nobody harms and an individual gains the happiness from being fictosexual!

I sincerely despise the staunch Christians, feminists, and the staunch structuralists, persecuting my personality trait!

Saturday, May 28, 2022

Stirnerism: The most theoretically completed but the least feasible political philosophy

 

Max Stirner is a political philosopher who invented the idea and the logical construction of individualistic anarchism. This essay comprehensively refers to his political philosophy as Stirnerism. Stirnerism is a unique theory which challenges not only the other non-anarchist political theories but also all the existing anarchist theories. At the same time, Stirnerism seems to be the most theoretically completed but the least feasible political philosophy to implement in real.

In terms of the mainstream political analyses, the establishment of anarchist state falls into either the communism rejecting the private property right and the monetary economy or the survivalist capitalism where none provides the re-distribution of the wealth even when the monopoly oppresses the mass. By means of the feasible policy implementation, it is more likely to end up with resulting in such a state. Stirnerism attempting both protecting the private property right and preventing the wealth monopoly by few.

Stirnerism claims for relinquishing not only the hereditary monarchy and aristocracy but also the nation state itself as well as the entire legal system propping up it. This is the characteristics shared with the other forms of anarchism.  In contrast to other forms of anarchism, Stirnerism distinguishes itself from the contemporary anarchism by insisting on preserving the private property right for each individual and the market economy as a form of their freedom of exchange and choice. It appears each individual's own right to materially deserve her/himself and their own natural desire and own freedom of choice as one of its fundamental principles. Stirnerism regards that the existence of nation state government hinders individual freedom and right instead of protecting them.

 Stirnerism also claims for preventing the monopoly by few hijacking the pure free market economy to protect majority individuals' right to enjoy their freedom and right. In another word, it insists on discouraging another form of government, such as a monopolistic corporation and an organised criminal faction, monopolising both economy and society. This is what John Maynard Keynes thought of with the government positive intervention by reforming its governance instead of abolishing it. By means of economic and social policy, Stirnerism and Keynesian share the similar quality despite their complete characteristic difference. 

To accomplish these Stirnerist attempts, the existence of the cooperative which is sustained by each individual's voluntary contribution to a public administration. The efficient and fair administration of public goods and services will be the key to accomplish Stirnerian deal which is identical to Keynesian policy. Stirnerism replaces nation state government with an alternative operatable form of governance without a nation state, which is the spontaneously established cooperative by the voluntary union of individuals.

This problem which this public sector model based on the cooperative faces is that it requires the high competency level of all individuals participating in its socioeconomics. Like the P2P computer network system, all the participants must have a reasonably high specification level to cooperatively sustain the entire network structure. Each individual must be knowledgeable about the fair judgement and aware of their self-responsibility of contributing to their public goods and services (I.e., the free ride must be prevented with the best effort).  

Instead of one or few authorities commanding the majority to do what they have got to do in their daily life, the majority mass have a lot of responsibilities as an exchange for their freedom and right.  These mass individual must be enlightened enough to look after themselves and be knowledgable and responsible about forming a contract with the other individuals.  In another word, individuals have to be aware of themselves as social beings who are responsible enough to accomplish their social duty as their exchange for living there with their autonomic freedom and right. 

Overall, having taken these issues into consideration, Stirnerism sounds really ideal whilst it also sounds a lot of works to implement in real. More than the other political philosophical theories, it requires almost all individuals participating together to be enlightened enough to understand  and fulfil the required specification necessary for Stirnerian P2P style social contacts.  Perhaps, some future technological advancements may provide individuals with the solution to enable it to be feasible. Hence, it is still challenging to put Stirnerism into practice in real world even though it is still a very attractive as well as interesting theory worth considering for its implementation.

Sunday, June 13, 2021

Stirnerism can be explained as the blockchain P2P network like Bitcoin

> Is Stirner an anarchist?

There are some arguments claiming Max Stirner is not really an anarchist because his theory regards highly of some sorts of system orders without a unified autocracy and spontaneously determined contracts.  

What defining Stirner's socio-political theory (Stirnerism) as an anarchism is that it attempts to dismantle all the architecture of the modern bureaucratic system and monopoly of both government and huge private corporations.  Furthermore, it suggests, instead of managing public goods and services in the centralised authority, free individuals cooperate together when these public things are needed to manage under a naturally made contract.  

It can be somehow similar to the fundamental form of direct democracy where all the decisions are democratically determined by means of individuals' direct representation of voices.   Nevertheless, there is a fundamental difference with the political system of direct democracy and Stirnerism. The former still owns a congress or some form of the centrally controlled organisation monitoring the whole system.  By contrast, the latter is not supposed to have any central control tower of managing politics and social issues.

 In another word, Stirnerist anarchism is different from a radical anarchism disregarding the public managements and contract-forming.  It is quite difficult to explain what Stirnerism really is.  Nonetheless, thanks to the current notable development of the information technology, it has become easier to image what Stirnerism will be like nowadays.  

> Stirnerism is like the blockchain based on the P2P network 

Frankly speaking, Stirnerist socio-political structure can be compared to the network of the blockchain like the one used in the cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.  This network system does not have any central server monitoring the entire system as a control tower.  

Instead, each individual computer calculates and verifies the interactions and actions among the community utilising this network system.  This is called the peer to peer (P2P) network where their application architecture is distributed among these individual computers.  These individual computers participate in their tasks and workloads as the peers.  The privilege and the equipment are equally distributed among these peers, and there is no authorities overriding their rules of activities. 

This network architecture is what Stirnerism attempts to apply to the socio-politics of human individuals.  These individual humans are supposed to cooperate as the peers to share the tasks and the workload according to their needs and skills.  There is no unified central authority overriding their mutually formed peering connection. 

 

On the other hand, the P2P network system of both the blockchain and Stirnerism contains some fundamental problem.   This P2P system tends to be still inefficient when it comes to the management of data serving and access authentication.  

Establishing an centralised system is efficient to store and serve the collectively used data, services, and public goods because maintenance can be concentrated on the limited places.  By contrast, the P2P network requires all agents to share the same responsibility of maintaining, managing, and updating their quality of what required to prop up this whole entire system.  

This is why each transaction of Bitcoin still takes about at least 10 minutes.  In addition, organising human individuals in terms of the P2P network is far more extraordinarily challenging than setting up the computers. The setup for individuals cannot be flexibly adjusted as same as the artificial creations, and it is beyond our comprehension by means of the imaginablity of the current human civilisation. 

 

Yet, there is still a hope for accomplishing Stirnerist P2P public management.  At least, Stirnerism has become imaginable to establish to the certain extend by comparing the socio-politics with the hard scientific technology since the introduction of the blockchain and its P2P network. 

In the past when the information technology is not developed as much as nowadays, there has no civilisation having succeeded in establishing such an individualist mutualist anarchist society like Stirnerism even for a short time period.  This is simply because it was unimaginable.  

Some hints from the development of the hard science can be linked to developing soft-science and arts of politics, sociology, and economics in the future.  When a hard scientist discover some feasible solution of transforming the current P2P network system to the more efficient and manageable alternative, it will be beneficial for a soft scientist to innovate their own theory.





Wednesday, April 21, 2021

ABL Futurism

I always write about analyses on events in past and present because most of these analyses are about history related to socioeconomics, daily political events, and statistics (may infer future events although the inference is derived from past and present).  Nowadays, majority individuals seem to be tired of knowing various upsetting or even depressing present events, and knowing past events hardly guide to overcome from the recent unforeseen events to anticipate optimistic future outcomes.

At this time, this essay attempts to demonstrate the imagination of the future world structure.  It is simply an imagination not derived from my own analytic tools, and I am not an expert of astrophysics basing the design of futurism.  Therefore, this content is indeed an amateur work so hope the readers tolerate this amateurism. Nevertheless, this attempt based on my amateur-imagination might hint some productive idea-formation in my field of expertise socio-economics.   

This discourse about the imaginary future of the human civilisation is mainly based on the Kardashev scale distinguishing the civilisation development level into several types.  For example, the type I civilisation enables a civilisation to harness the entire energy of and control the entire atmosphere of their own planet; the type II civilisation does of their entire-solar system they are living in; and the type III civilisation expands this scale to the entire galaxy their solar system is located in. 

The current Earthian civilisation is considered to be the type 0.74 in terms of Kardashev scale.  The step starts from the rough proposal to develop the civilisation from this current level to the further, and it covers the brief imaginary strategy to evolve from the below type I to the point when it reaches to type II.

 

1. Evolving toward the type I civilisation while colonising the Moon and some asteroids 

Human individuals are ought to stabilise their living environment more than nowadays in order to develop their civilisation level beyond this state.  They are still prone to various unforeseen natural and political disasters hindering the development.  

The entire world cooperation will be mandatory to induce such a scenario so the political and socio-economic consensus among the entire human individuals living in this world will be the crucial key to implement it. At the same time, this cooperative unification must not invade personal liberty of these human individuals in order to maintain their happiness and the innovative free thinkings.  This is also crucial to encourage the members to voluntarily input their productivity and provide some innovations to research and develop this enormous plan. 

On the top of this aforementioned condition, the abundant physical material resources must be obtained.  The earth itself may not be enough to extract this amount of resources to raise the human civilisation up to the type I. In particular, various kinds of high-tech equipment require a multitude of rare metals which are more abundant in the Moon and asteroids floating in the solar system. 

Firstly, asteroid-mining might be demanded faster than colonising the Moon in order to obtain the already scarce rare-metals.  The artificial intelligence (AI) will be applied to remotely control the asteroid catcher launched into the space.  

There are various unique methods to reach the Moon.  The conventional method is rocketing a space-shuttle, which exhausts chemical resources and energy.  As the Moon expedition requires not only launching materials and various equipment machineries but also sending actual humans to the Moon via the space travel.  This process has to be far more efficient than completely relying on the energy inefficient conventional rocketing method in order to prevent the substantial environmental damage on the Earth.  

While capturing some asteroid and colonising the Moon, it is expected for the human civilisation to be developed to reach the fully type I by taking an advantage of the material development and the political cooperation.  They are expected to realise that their cooperation with more available material resources may enable their capacity to evolve their civilisation level.  

In addition, colonising the Moon to establish the stable moon-base is useful not only as a mining base for the resource mine but also as a transfer station for the further expedition toward the solar system.  At this point, humans become able to make a good use of resources from both the intraterrestrial and the extraterrestrial area within the circle of the Lagrange points where the Moon rotates around the Earth.  

On the other hand, the human population and the human-individuals' desire will expand further than things will be available at that point.  In order to avoid their conflict for limited resources and limiting both their mind and their available capacity, they will need to endeavour to evolve their civilisation beyond what is available in the Earth and her orbital satellites. Then, their expedition expands to the solar system. 

 

2. Terraforming Mars and Venus

Mars is the most notable candidate for the future immigration destination for humans by colonising it in an extra-terrestrial field.  The Moon is not capable enough to prop up the continuously growing human-population and civilisation scale. However, the colonisation process proposed here is different from many pioneers' proposal: Instead of launching capital equipment and humans directly onto Mars such as being done onto the Moon, the discourse here manifestos to completely terraform Mars by recovering the atmosphere which disappeared in the past.

In this proposal, Mars is treated not merely as some substation like the Moon and a big asteroid; It regards of Mars as a backup planet of the Earth where humans permanently station to live by breathing air, utilising water resources, and bringing in plants and animals from the Earth in the atmospheric environment. 

Reviving the atmosphere requires increasing the magnetic wave produced from Martian core.  The magnetic wave from a rocky planet's core protects the planet's atmosphere from the intense solar radiation destroying the atmosphere. When the substantially weakened magnetism, the atmosphere in the past was once stripped off by the solar radiation.  Therefore, strengthening the magnetic wave is essential. 

For the time being, there is no technological invention achieving to increase the magnetic wave from the planet's core so it assumes this technology will be invented in the future.   When this technology is invented and enough material and financial resources are prepared for, a set of the megastructure will be built based on this technology.  In order to strengthen Martian magnetism, these megastructures will be launched onto the Martian Lagrange points, L1 and L2, rotating around Mars.   They are assume to offer the mechanism of strengthening the magnetism from outside Mars on these Lagrange points.

When the magnetism is strengthened enough to sustain the atmosphere, the positive cycle of floating gas in Mars is assumed to emerge.  At this moment, carbon-dioxide (CO2) is trapped as a form of dry-ice.  When the atmosphere appears and the heat from sunlight remains in it, CO2 is expected to flow inside the atmosphere.  Then, Martian atmosphere will be warned up.

The huge deposit of water-ice is buried under Martian soil.  When the aforementioned atmosphere starts offering a warmer temperature, the ice will melt to produce water.  Then, oceans and rivers of water are expected to emerge.  Afterward, there will be a multitude of implemented methods to create oxygen, implant Earthian vegetations, etc. 

Terraforming and colonising Mars is important not only for duplicating the Earthian environment but also establishing the transfer station for Jupiter expedition.  They will need a significantly huge amount of hydrogen to extract from Jupiter for the next mission, terraforming Venus to colonise.  In particular, on the way to reach the type II civilisation (colonising the entire solar system), this potential of colonising Venus will be helpful to increase human-resources and to proceed the expedition to Mercury and Sun.

Venus, another rocky planet whose size is close to Earth, is another useful planet to terraform to enable human-habitation.  Venus has already contain her atmosphere despite its completely inhabitable condition.  Nonetheless, it is worth considering to take advantage of this already existing atmosphere.  

In order to transform this bizarre Venusian, a massive amount of hydrogen possibly extracted from Jupiter and/or Saturn will be bombarded into Venusian atmosphere filled with CO2.  The chemical reaction with CO2 and hydrogen is expected to produce oxygen and then water.  

Afterward, the next step is to shield Venus from the extreme sun heat and modifying the oddly long daylight time by installing some megastructure.  At that moment of technology, this will only matter of resources and motivation as the technology capable to achieve will be already available then.

During this process, when the situation becomes more or less controllable by humans, they will build a bunch of floating fortress shaped like a blimp to station inside there.  Unlike Venusian surface below her atmosphere at the pre-terraforming period, the temperature of the inside atmosphere above the surface is considered to be habitable.  

The next step will be the journey toward Mercury to construct the enormous factory to build Dyson Sphere surrounding Sun.  Dyson Sphere is a mandatory super-megastructure to produce the massive scale electric power enough to prop up the human civilisation spread inside the solar system. 


 3. Constructing Dyson Sphere from the factory and the power substation built on Mercury

This gigantic megastructure called Dyson sphere directly harnesses the energy produced from the nuclear fusion reaction of a star.  This is roughly estimated to produce the power equivalent to approximately 100 quintillion times of the electricity power plant equipped with the most efficient nuclear reactor available nowadays. Instead of capturing electricity from star-light by solar panels located in either the planet surface or the planet's orbit, the capturing equipment is settled directly beside a star itself. 

Some professional astronomers and many amateurs believe that there has already been an existence of Dyson sphere in the universe.  For instance, Hubble Space Telescope has detected a star in several millions light-years away showing the unusually frequent dimming of lights.  

Many sceptical astronomers have claimed that it is because of a bunch of space dusts and asteroids floating on this star orbit. Nevertheless, stars are the remarkable source of energy seemingly well-serviceable to sustain and expand a civilisation entrenched within or beyond a star-system. Therefore, there can be some alien civilisation successfully having constructed this gigantic megastructure to supply such a scale of energy power.

For humans living and thriving in the solar system, Dyson sphere will become an essential power supply source.  In particular, after expanding their habitation beyond their mother Earth, they will eventually need this scale of energy from the place where it is efficiently harnessed to meet their demand.  

At this period of development stage, they have to improve the living standard of their home planet Earth, maintaining the liveable environment for humans in their colonies, the Moon, Mars, and Venus, and continuing to station on asteroids and possibly the moons of Jupiter and Saturn.  Therefore, there will be a robust demand for the massive energy supply source of Dyson sphere for sure.

By means of the current understanding of physics, enveloping Sun with a solid shell of the sphere is so fragile that a collide with small asteroid will demolish the entire structure.  Then, instead of building a gigantic solid shell, many astrophysicists have come up with the idea of launching a humongous number of orbiting solar-panels (or the mirrors reflecting sun lights) and the energy collecting stations swarming around Sun. 

In order to keep these swarming parts floating, their materials have to be light and not easily colliding with the others.  In order to produce this humongous number, the design structure has to be simple as much as possible.  Thus, some astrophysicists have proposed the idea of combining the solar panel mechanism with the mechanism of the solar-sails 

The construction base must be build on the location with an abundant metal resource and near Sun. Mercury is the only candidate place to establish this base.   Mercury is the planet closest to Sun and metal-rich.  Furthermore, Mercury does not have an atmosphere so it is convenient to launch these parts onto Sun's orbit.  Then, it will be possible to constantly launch these parts by rail-guns from the surface of Mercury to Sun's orbit while repeatedly manufacturing these parts.  

The power transmission station between Dyson sphere and the other places will be settled in the Lagrange points L3, L4, and L5 of Mercury (L1 and L2 are too close to dodge the beam of energy power supplied from Dyson sphere).


4. Endeavour toward beyond the type II civilisation

After finishing the construction of Dyson sphere and successfully transmitting the energy supplied from there, this will be the point where humans will achieve to establish the type II civilisation of Kardashev scale.  

At that moment, humans will have explored the entire solar system to Pluto.  From then on, it becomes really difficult to imagine exactly how the human civilisation evolves furthermore.  

There is one perspective assuming that they will attach a gigantic thruster on Sun assisted by Dyson sphere to move the entire solar system all together.  It suggests this movement will be needed to dodge a shock-wave from a supernova or something threatening the existence of the solar system and the civilisation itself.

After these aforementioned events, it is beyond our comprehension to predict what is going to happen to evolve the civilisation beyond these imaginations. Yet, we have never know how the future will turn up to be meanwhile it is indeed interesting and might be helpful to imagine such a futuristic event.