Two legends both named Immanuel: Pluto opposition to Sun v.s. Pluto no-aspect

The Pluto-aspect characteristics of the astrological natal chart are often discussed inside our astrological circle. In particular, the natal aspect of Pluto forming the opposition to the natal light (Sun/Moon) and the counterpart of Pluto without any aspect (called no-aspect) have been mentioned in separate blog posts.

As this time, it can be a time to post an essay comparing these two Pluto aspects in one article. Coincidently, there are two historical legends called by the same name Immanuel to compare by means of these two natal chart-aspects.

• The former is Jesus Christ (called Immanuel while his childhood just after his birth) who was endowed with his natal Pluto forming the opposition to his natal Sun.
  • Please note that it refers to his controversial birthday 25th December of the first year of the AD regardless of its historical accuracy because it refers to his well-known personality as a protagonist character in a quasi-fictional story.
• The latter is Immanuel Kant, one of the most remarkable and influential modern philosophers in the world, was endowed with his natal Pluto forming no-aspect with his other natal signs.

Both are the legend historically famous enough to leave precious assets in this world so that they are useful examples of showing the contrast of these two Pluto aspects, the opposition to the natal Sun and the no-aspect.

Although both have equally remarkable qualities, their characteristics and their fates are notably different. This characteristic difference between these two legends is an interesting and explicit example showing the characteristic difference between the Pluto opposition and the Pluto no-aspect.

Immanuel Jesus Christ with his natal Pluto opposition became an eternal divine sovereign known by almost all individuals across the world and loved by his followers at his contemporary period onward. His life was dramatic with his unimaginable challenges and ended with his unavoidable fate.

It is suspected that every individual with a deep interest in academic subjects including such as history, law, philosophy, politics, and public sector economics must know Immanuel Kant and his academic works. Most of these theories having existed after his contribution contain his footprints. The progress of accumulating his fame was slow but was steady and became significantly notable at the end.

In terms of the fame, Christ was far superior to Kant. However, Kant’s merit and contribution to the terrestrial world were far more prevailing than Christ’s counterparts. Rather than Christ himself, his ardent followers made Christ famous through writing the New Testament and orally persuading people to remind Christ’s doings. By contrast, Kant put his own efforts for establishing himself to make him famous at the end.

Regardless of individuals’ interest of something particular, nobody may be unable to avoid listening to Christ’s name while living in the world of human civilisation. Christ was unconditionally loved and hated while he was alive. His painful fate haunted through his terrestrial life, but he was deeply blessed with the celestial supremacy’s protection.

Individuals’ knowledge about Kant might be really limited even though they are living in the current world under Kant’s heavy influence. While his youth, he was quite distant from an excessive emotional attachment with others because he enjoyed his organised, quiet, and simple life style whilst making his perseverant efforts on his story and innovation. His social status was not so remarkable while his youth although his social status suddenly became ultra-remarkable when his academic works were finally recognised by the authority and the mass in his relatively elder period.

To sum up, the contrast of these two legendary quality lifestyles well depicts the characteristic difference between the Pluto opposition and the Pluto no-aspect. Pluto represents not only authority but also the mass support and the effect of Pluto generally appears either extremely intensively or extremely incompletely. Christ had been not only haunted but also blessed by the extreme intensity of Pluto meanwhile Pluto’s influence over Kant shifted from null to extremely effectual.